TECHNOLOGY

Slim Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED laptop review: Efficient RTX 4070 for avid gamers and creatives

Creator? Gamer? CreAmer. Using a rather modified make, recent connections and recent hardware grounded in an Intel Gen 13 and a Nvidia RTX 4070, the Aero 16 OLED seeks to raise shut over avid gamers and creators alike. We attach aside the laptop by draw of its paces to search out out what the case change and hardware upgrades convey to the desk.

Gigabyte’s Aero 16 OLED is an racy mix of gaming laptop and workstation for creatives. To boot to to the switch from Alder to Raptor Lake CPU and from Nvidia RTX 30x to RTX 40x, varied modifications glean also been made, similar to to the case and the ports.

We have got previously reviewed the predecessor with the RTX 3080 Ti and our most contemporary configuration has an RTX 4070. To this point we have most effective reviewed the recent Razer Blade 18 with the identical GPU, so the 18-incher will want to again as comparison within the 3D benchmarks. Otherwise we compare old abilities 16-slouch competitors, including the Asus Zenbook Pro 16X OLED, the Asus TUF Gaming A16 and the MSI CreatorPro Z16P with its Nvidia A300.

Processor

Intel Core i9-13900H 14 x 1.9 – 5.4 GHz, 115 W PL2 / Short Burst, 61 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-H

Reminiscence

32 GB 

, 2x 16 GB Samsung DDR5-4800

Screen

16.00 slouch 16:10, 3840 x 2400 pixel 283 PPI, Samsung SDC4191 (ATNA60YV09-0, OLED, sleek: yes, HDR, 60 Hz

Mainboard

Intel Alder Lake-P PCH

Soundcard

Intel Raptor Lake-P/U/H PCH – cAVS

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB 3.2 Gen 2×2 20Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Vitality Beginning (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm headset, Card Reader: microSD card reader

Networking

Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2

Size

high x width x depth (in mm): 18 x 354 x 255 ( = 0.71 x 13.94 x 10.04 in)

Battery

88 Wh Lithium-Polymer

Running Machine

Microsoft Dwelling windows 11 Pro

Digicam

Webcam: FullHD IR Webcam for WIndows Hello
Necessary Digicam: 2 MPix

Additional aspects

Audio system: stereo speakers, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes

Weight

2.1 kg ( = 74.08 oz / 4.63 kilos), Vitality Provide: 705 g ( = 24.87 oz / 1.55 kilos)

Express: The manufacturer could well additionally exhaust ingredients from varied suppliers including pronounce their private praises panels, drives or memory sticks with identical specs.

At the birth be conscious, the make looks to be unchanged, however at the same time as you happen to glean interaction a more in-depth watch, you doubtlessly can additionally be conscious that the narrow, silver metal chassis has changed relatively quite a bit. To illustrate, it has change into even thinner and Gigabyte has lastly shifted just among the ports to the assist. Overall, the manufacturer’s make is more within the direction of a alternate and place of work laptop than a gaming laptop, that could well additionally definitely please the target neighborhood. So the hidden gamer looks to be like relatively inconspicuous in an place of work environment, even alongside a MacBook. 

The tender metal unibody remains to be accumulate, significantly at the atrocious, which is ready to no longer ceaselessly be bent. The keyboard has been decreased quite of. 

The pronounce their private praises lid, on which the illuminated “Aero” mark is emblazoned, is a itsy-bitsy less inflexible. Handiest the pronounce their private praises frame is fabricated from plastic.

Ventilation grilles are nearly in every single place, particularly at the assist, on the facets, beneath and above. The design quality looks to be on a upright stage and no gaps had been found. 

{component.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});doc.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_335676’).checked = fraudulent;doc.querySelectorAll(‘#showDeviceSize_335449’).forEach(component => {component.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});doc.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_335449’).checked = fraudulent;doc.querySelectorAll(‘#showDeviceSize_328255’).forEach(component => {component.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});doc.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_328255’).checked = fraudulent;doc.querySelectorAll(‘#showDeviceSize_333487’).forEach(component => {component.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});doc.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_333487’).checked = fraudulent;doc.querySelectorAll(‘#showDeviceSize_333558’).forEach(component => {component.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});doc.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_333558’).checked = fraudulent;doc.querySelectorAll(‘#showDeviceSize_335542’).forEach(component => {component.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});doc.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_335542’).checked = fraudulent;return fraudulent;” title=”cowl all”>❌

399.9 mm / 15.7 slouch 275.4 mm / 10.8 slouch 21.9 mm / 0.862 slouch 3 kg6.68 lbs355 mm / 14 slouch 252 mm / 9.92 slouch 27 mm / 1.063 slouch 2.2 kg4.82 lbs356 mm / 14 slouch 248.5 mm / 9.78 slouch 22.4 mm / 0.882 slouch 2.3 kg5.05 lbs359 mm / 14.1 slouch 256 mm / 10.1 slouch 19 mm / 0.748 slouch 2.4 kg5.23 lbs356 mm / 14 slouch 254 mm / 10 slouch 19.5 mm / 0.768 slouch 2.4 kg5.3 lbs354 mm / 13.9 slouch 255 mm / 10 slouch 18 mm / 0.709 slouch 2.1 kg4.63 lbs297 mm / 11.7 slouch 210 mm / 8.27 slouch 1 mm / 0.03937 slouch 5.7 g0.01257 lbs

So much has changed within the ports, fortunately, for the explanation that meager three USB-C ports of the predecessor had to be expanded with an Aero Hub to incorporate HDMI, USB-A, and plenty others.

This year, the recent Aero houses nearly the complete needed ports. To enact this, it utilizes the place at the assist the place the mains connection is, to illustrate. We would glean most standard a USB-A in want to 1 among the three USB-C ports on the aspect, and a LAN port remains to be lacking, however no longer lower than there is now an HDMI port and a (microSD) reader. The port distribution is upright, with the exception of for USB-A at the assist in want to on the aspect.

MicroSD card protrudes most effective minimally
MicroSD card protrudes most effective minimally

MicroSD playing cards click on into place and protrude most effective minimally (1 – 2 mm).

The transfer charges are upright; we copied 1 GB of portray fabric from our AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60 to the desktop in about 7 seconds.

If competitors glean a reader in any respect, it is slower.

Replaceable WLAN module
Replaceable WLAN module

The Intel AX210 chip was once also installed in final year’s model and again ensures upright transfer charges, even though the MSI CreatorPro is even sooner. 

The module helps Wifi 6E and thus the 6 GHz range.

Networking
iperf3 win AXE11000 6GHz
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wi-fi Community Adapter





1690 (1617min, 1618.16P1 – 1721max) MBit/s ∼100% +5%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210





1611 (805min – 1631max) MBit/s ∼95%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (886 – 1857, n=31, final 2 years)





1551 MBit/s ∼92% -4%

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211





1516 (769min – 1565max) MBit/s ∼90% -6%

Moderate Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
  (885 – 1827, n=6)





1487 MBit/s ∼88% -8%

iperf3 win AXE11000
Moderate of class Gaming
  (685 – 1890, n=65, final 2 years)





1455 MBit/s ∼100%

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211





1362 (1249min – 1437max) MBit/s ∼94%

Moderate Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
  (1030 – 1318, n=2)





1174 MBit/s ∼81%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210





1030 (752min – 1313max) MBit/s ∼71%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211





942 (920min – 950max) MBit/s ∼65%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
MediaTek MT7921





899 (755min – 936max) MBit/s ∼62%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wi-fi Community Adapter





1659 (1602min, 1605.19P1 – 1702max) MBit/s ∼100% +15%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (980 – 1875, n=29, final 2 years)





1521 MBit/s ∼92% +5%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210





1444 (745min – 1487max) MBit/s ∼87%

Moderate Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
  (1198 – 1444, n=5)





1333 MBit/s ∼80% -8%

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211





1230 (1091min – 1327max) MBit/s ∼74% -15%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Moderate of class Gaming
  (740 – 1780, n=58, final 2 years)





1372 MBit/s ∼100%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210





1333 (1044min – 1390max) MBit/s ∼97%

Moderate Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
  (1320 – 1333, n=2)





1327 MBit/s ∼97%

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211





1196 (618min – 1298max) MBit/s ∼87%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
MediaTek MT7921





908 (806min – 973max) MBit/s ∼66%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211





891 (558min – 996max) MBit/s ∼65%

050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip

Gigabyte has lastly installed a Corpulent HD camera into the ingenious laptop, with the resulting portray being relatively usable, even in suboptimal lights prerequisites. A watch at the ColorChecker, alternatively, unfortunately exhibits that the colours deviate greatly. The predecessor had a 720p camera.

ColorChecker

18 ∆E

23 ∆E

15.4 ∆E

18.4 ∆E

16.9 ∆E

18.5 ∆E

23.3 ∆E

21.5 ∆E

15.4 ∆E

11.6 ∆E

17.9 ∆E

21.1 ∆E

16.6 ∆E

20.1 ∆E

15 ∆E

16.4 ∆E

13.7 ∆E

20.7 ∆E

2.3 ∆E

13.6 ∆E

20.7 ∆E

19.1 ∆E

16.5 ∆E

16.5 ∆E

ColorChecker Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF: 17.17 ∆E min: 2.28 – max: 23.28 ∆E

The Aero is never any longer genuinely for security lovers. TPM is on board, however there may perchance be no longer such a thing as a fingerprint sensor or Kensington connection.

No accessories are incorporated in conjunction with the laptop upon have interaction.

In Germany, the manufacturer provides a 24-month warranty. This could perchance additionally differ in varied regions, so buyers should silent double-take a look at ahead of have interaction.

Cooling pads for the SSDs
Cooling pads for the SSDs

First, 10 torx screws should silent be eradicated. Afterwards, finding a pickle within the tight chassis for inserting stage instruments is never any longer genuinely easy. The excellent manner to enact here is in direction of the assist. Once doubtlessly the predominant step has been made, it becomes powerful more straightforward and the baseplate would be unexcited relatively with out problems.

Interior, you glean gotten access to the followers, the battery, the replaceable WLAN module, the two RAM slots and the two M.2 SSD slots, one among which is occupied. There are cooling pads on the atrocious plate for the two SSD slots.

The keyboard now has white in want to dusky keys. This looks to be like more dapper, however it is best to silent refrain from activating the white keyboard backlight in intellectual lights, otherwise it is doubtless you’ll no longer be ready to discern the lettering – however who does?

The layout looks to be like very orderly. Now no longer one among the keys seem out of place, and even the arrow keys are of well-liked dimension – very upright. Keys are of medium dimension and are all effectively spaced aside.

Key mosey is around 1.7 mm and the suggestions upright barely perceptible. Typing is immediate and the noise moderate, however the place bar is a chunk louder.

Though the on/off switch is integrated into the tip upright of the keyboard, it has a magnificent firmer strain point and is a chunk smaller so as that it is never always genuinely easy to press accidentally. In Gigabyte laptops, the special keys for brightness (extra left here) and volume (extra upright here) are every so recurrently swapped, which takes some getting mature to.

The touchpad stays the identical dimension as its predecessor (approx. 12.1 x 7.6 cm), however is now silver in want to dusky and affords upright gliding properties, even with very slack movements.

The integrated keys provide obvious suggestions and are thus quite of louder than the keyboard keys, however silent moderate.

Gigabyte again installs a 16-slouch OLED panel from Samsung with a 16:10 aspect ratio and a 4K decision of three,840 x 2,400. The panel has a brand recent model number, however silent most effective affords 60 Hz – a design back for avid gamers. Otherwise the OLED panel boasts a prosperous distinction, a big dusky stage and very upright illumination. The IPS competitors can no longer assist here.

We measured a brightness of upright below 400 nits in SDR pronounce their private praises mode. Nonetheless the panel also meets the HDR600 well-liked. So we measured in HDR mode and arrived at a peak brightness of 620 nits. That is most effective doable with a itsy-bitsy measuring discipline, since OLEDs immediate darken on colossal, intellectual areas.

Screen masks bleeding is never any longer a venture with OLEDs. Response instances are also perfect.

398.31
cd/m²
392.73
cd/m²
397.07
cd/m²
393.69
cd/m²
389.97
cd/m²
397.95
cd/m²
391.06
cd/m²
392.12
cd/m²
402.15
cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

Samsung SDC4191 (ATNA60YV09-0

X-Ceremony i1Pro 3

Most: 402.15 cd/m² (Nits) Moderate: 395 cd/m² Minimal: 1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 387.56 cd/m²
Dissimilarity: 12999:1 (Murky: 0.03 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.2, calibrated: 1.68
ΔE Greyscale 2.23 | 0.57-98 Ø5.4
96.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
ninety nine.9% Screen P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.41

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Samsung SDC4191 (ATNA60YV09-0, OLED, 3840×2400, 16.00
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Samsung SDC416B, AMOLED, 3840×2400, 16.00
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
AU Optronics B180QAN01.0, IPS, 2560×1600, 18.00
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung SDC415D, OLED, 3840×2400, 16.00
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
NE160WUM-NX2 (BOE0B33), IPS-Level, 1920×1200, 16.00
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
B160QAN02.N, IPS, 2560×1600, 16.00
Screen

-5%

-3%

-20%

-4%

Screen P3 Coverage

ninety nine.9

96.9

-3%

ninety nine.84

0%

69.4

-31%

97.6

-2%

sRGB Coverage

100

ninety nine.8

0%

ninety nine.ninety nine

0%

97.8

-2%

ninety nine.9

0%

AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage

96.4

85.3

-12%

88.9

-8%

70.9

-26%

87.4

-9%

Response Instances

-7%

-207%

-1%

-580%

-407%

Response Time Gray 50% / Gray 80% *

2 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return fraudulent;”>?(1, 1)

Response Time Murky / White *

1.98 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return fraudulent;”>?(0.5, 1.forty eight)

PWM Frequency

60

Screen masks

34%

-208%

-8%

-80%

-118%

Brightness heart

389.97

368

-6%

549.6

41%

346

-11%

308

-21%

407

4%

Brightness

395

368

-7%

524

33%

354

-10%

293

-26%

388

-2%

Brightness Distribution

97

93

-4%

89

-8%

96

-1%

90

-7%

88

-9%

Murky Level *

0.03

0.01

67%

0.Fifty three

-1667%

0.23

-667%

0.36

-1100%

Dissimilarity

12999

36800

183%

1037

-92%

1339

-90%

1131

-91%

Colorchecker dE 2000 *

2

2.33

-17%

3.32

-66%

2.28

-14%

1.47

26%

1.3

35%

Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *

4.1

4.34

-6%

6.63

-62%

4.94

-20%

2.98

27%

2.5

39%

Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *

1.68

2.7

-61%

2.16

-29%

1.02

39%

0.7

58%

Greyscale dE 2000 *

2.23

0.8

64%

2

10%

1.64

26%

2.2

1%

2.1

6%

Gamma

2.41 91%

2.119 104%

2.29 96%

2.37 93%

2.228 ninety nine%

2.26 97%

CCT

6323 103%

6569 ninety nine%

6319 103%

6384 102%

6228 104%

6437 101%

Total Moderate (Program / Settings)

14% /
23%

-140% /
-164%

-4% /
-5%

-227% /
-138%

-176% /
-135%

* … smaller is better

Gigabyte advertises the Aero 16 as offering 100% DCI-P3 coverage and our measurements verify this recount. Even AdobeRGB is covered at 96.4 p.c. The OLED pronounce their private praises is thus very appropriate for modifying photos and videos.

The pronounce their private praises is already effectively calibrated ex works; our calibration by draw of Portrait Shows Calman Color Calibration pushes the DeltaE values down quite of even more. So the pronounce their private praises has most effective very itsy-bitsy colour and grayscale deviations. Our ICC profile would be downloaded above.

Screen Response Instances

Screen response instances price how rapidly the display is ready to change from one colour to the subsequent. Late response instances can lead to afterimages and could trigger tantalizing objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Avid gamers of rapidly-paced 3D titles should silent pay special consideration to rapidly response instances.

       Response Time Murky to White
1.98 ms … upward push ↗ and descend ↘ blended ↗ 0.5 ms upward push
↘ 1.forty eight ms descend
The display exhibits very rapidly response charges in our tests and should silent be very effectively suited to immediate-paced gaming.
Compared, all examined gadgets range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (most) ms. » 3 % of all gadgets are better.
This implies that the measured response time is better than the frequent of all examined gadgets (22.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Gray to 80% Gray
2 ms … upward push ↗ and descend ↘ blended ↗ 1 ms upward push
↘ 1 ms descend
The display exhibits very rapidly response charges in our tests and should silent be very effectively suited to immediate-paced gaming.
Compared, all examined gadgets range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (most) ms. » 2 % of all gadgets are better.
This implies that the measured response time is better than the frequent of all examined gadgets (35.6 ms).

Screen masks Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the display, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapidly succession – a capacity known as Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should silent ideally be undetectable to the human glance. If mentioned frequency is unbiased too low, users with sensitive eyes could well additionally abilities strain or complications or even sight the flickering altogether.

Screen masks flickering / PWM detected 60 Hz

The pronounce their private praises backlight sparkles at 60 Hz (Seemingly utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 60 Hz is terribly low, so the flickering could well additionally trigger eyestrain and complications after prolonged exhaust.

Compared: Fifty three % of all examined gadgets enact no longer exhaust PWM to dim the pronounce their private praises. If PWM was once detected, an moderate of 19343 (minimum: 5 – most: 3846000) Hz was once measured.

As is customary for OLEDs, the pronounce their private praises sparkles at 60 Hz at elephantine brightness. At around 50 p.c brightness and beneath, the frequency modifications, and 238 Hz could well additionally indicate stressful for sensitive folks.

Exterior, after all, the reflective surface is distracting. The rather moderate SDR brightness and the upright contrasts can most effective stability out this downside to a itsy-bitsy extent. A shady converse and an instantaneous viewing angle are recommended.

A loss in brightness most effective becomes noticeable when the pronounce their private praises from impolite angles.

The Aero houses mark-recent hardware. The mix of i9-13900H, RTX 4070 and 32 GB DDR5-4800 should silent no longer pose any concerns for users, whether gaming or the exhaust of ingenious applications.

On the other hand, all this hardware is packed right into a slim case, so it does no longer bustle at elephantine vitality, as shall be proven beneath. Finally, a ingenious laptop is never any longer purported to be a dapper-hot roaring laptop, so hardcore avid gamers will want to endure a chunk here. 

The preinstalled vitality modes glean itsy-bitsy impact on performance
The preinstalled vitality modes glean itsy-bitsy impact on performance

Our take a look at machine didn’t glean a Management Center preinstalled, so there had been no performance modes to begin with. The vitality modes preinstalled in Dwelling windows by Gigabyte had nearly about no impact on CPU performance in Cinebench R15.

Therefore, and for the explanation that followers never stood silent at the birth, we installed the Gigabyte Management Center afterwards. Here we had been faced with the no longer easy preference of the performance mode: there are a complete of 5 here, and we had a no longer easy time deciding on between Instruct material Creator and Gaming. So we had to mediate between upright performance however louder followers, or quieter operation with weaker performance.

In the tip, we conducted the CPU benchmarks with out the Management Center, i.e. within the transport converse. The GPU benchmarks then bustle in gaming mode.

The machine is never any longer fully free of errors. To illustrate, it upright displayed a dusky window all by draw of some starts. Moreover confusing is that, moreover to to the modes, there is one more preference window “Vitality Mode” with extra alternatives for vitality control. These doubtless signify the vitality modes, because at the same time as you happen to situation this to Custom, the Dwelling windows vitality modes would be selected.

There may perchance be also an “AI” switch on the left of the predominant modes. The “AI” independently selects the acceptable mode reckoning on the venture, to illustrate, the vitality-saving mode after we disconnect the vitality walk.

On the heart of the Aero is an Intel Core i9-13900H, one among the flagships of Intel’s mark recent Raptor Lake series. This provides 6 performance and eight efficiency cores, with the frail clocking at as much as 5.4 GHz in turbo! Alternatively, the machine is also on hand with an i7-13700H.

In our Cinebench R15 loop, the Aero comes out on high, however the advantage over the i9-12900H from the Alder Lake series is marginal and the predecessor is never any longer ceaselessly slower sooner or later of all CPU tests.

A watch at the vitality consumption exhibits that it is best to silent indubitably install the Management Center. Because in transport converse, the CPU most effective treats itself to 70 W for a brief time ahead of falling to forty five W. On the assorted hand, at the same time as you happen to replace to Gaming Mode within the Management Center, the momentary TDP will enhance to 115 W, and then hangs at around 60 W for the the leisure of a Cinebench bustle. So it very powerful is dependent on the vitality settings.

With out Gaming mode, the recent Aero 16 is never any longer any sooner than its predecessor sooner or later of all CPU benchmarks.

The CPU can most effective design on around 20 W in battery mode and the Cinebench ranking is correspondingly lower.

01503004506007509001050120013501500165018001950210022502400255027002850Tooltip
CPU Performance Score
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX


86.1 pt ∼86%

Moderate Intel Core i9-13900H
 


65.9 pt ∼66%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK


64.5 pt ∼65%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H


61.5 pt ∼62%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H


60.6 pt ∼61%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H


59.9 pt ∼60%

Moderate of class Gaming
 


52.5 pt ∼Fifty three%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS


51.2 pt ∼51%

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX




28681 (25585.5min – 28680.9max) Functions ∼100% +49%

Moderate Intel Core i9-13900H
  (19188 – 20001, n=3)





19553 Functions ∼68% +2%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H


19188 Functions ∼67%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK


18106 Functions ∼63% -6%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H


17228 Functions ∼60% -10%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H





16691 (16019.4min – 16691.2max) Functions ∼58% -13%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (2435 – 34521, n=226, final 2 years)





15051 Functions ∼52% -22%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS


13995 Functions ∼49% -27%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX


2076 Functions ∼100% +22%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK


1940 Functions ∼93% +14%

Moderate Intel Core i9-13900H
  (1707 – 1974, n=3)





1873 Functions ∼90% +10%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H


1738 Functions ∼84% +2%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H


1718 Functions ∼83% +1%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H


1707 Functions ∼82%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (527 – 2169, n=223, final 2 years)





1624 Functions ∼78% -5%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS


1561 Functions ∼75% -9%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX


10919 Functions ∼100% +51%

Moderate Intel Core i9-13900H
  (7254 – 7552, n=3)





7406 Functions ∼68% +2%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H


7254 Functions ∼66%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK


6941 Functions ∼64% -4%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H


6742 Functions ∼62% -7%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H


6060 Functions ∼55% -16%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (930 – 13457, n=230, final 2 years)





5666 Functions ∼52% -22%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS


5441 Functions ∼50% -25%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX


797 Functions ∼100% +22%

Moderate Intel Core i9-13900H
  (651 – 751, n=3)





714 Functions ∼90% +10%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK


685 Functions ∼86% +5%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H


680 Functions ∼85% +4%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H


675 Functions ∼85% +4%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H


651 Functions ∼82%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (169 – 825, n=230, final 2 years)





625 Functions ∼78% -4%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS


612 Functions ∼77% -6%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX


4481 Functions ∼100% +51%

Moderate Intel Core i9-13900H
  (2963 – 3087, n=4)





3043 Functions ∼68% +3%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H




2963 (2772.58min – 2962.96max) Functions ∼66%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK


2780 Functions ∼62% -6%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H




2627 (2458.81min – 2626.74max) Functions ∼59% -11%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (400 – 5554, n=234, final 2 years)





2411 Functions ∼54% -19%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS




2299 (2235.89min – 2298.72max) Functions ∼51% -22%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H





2211 (2130.95min, 2137.41P1 – 2274.54max) Functions ∼49% -25%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX


297 Functions ∼100% +22%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK


279 Functions ∼94% +15%

Moderate Intel Core i9-13900H
  (243 – 292, n=4)





275 Functions ∼93% +13%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H


264 Functions ∼89% +9%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H


245 Functions ∼82% +1%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS


248 Functions ∼84% +2%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (seventy nine.2 – 312, n=230, final 2 years)





245 Functions ∼82% +1%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H


243 Functions ∼82%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H


238 Functions ∼80% -2%

Blender / v2.seventy nine BMW27 CPU
Moderate of class Gaming
  (93 – 1259, n=232, final 2 years)





247 Seconds * ∼100% -44%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS


225 Seconds * ∼91% -31%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H


201 Seconds * ∼81% -17%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK


200 Seconds * ∼81% -16%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H


185 Seconds * ∼75% -8%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H


172 Seconds * ∼70%

Moderate Intel Core i9-13900H
  (166 – 172, n=3)





168 Seconds * ∼68% +2%

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX


111 Seconds * ∼forty five% +35%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX


116665 MIPS ∼100% +57%

Moderate Intel Core i9-13900H
  (74386 – 79032, n=3)





76640 MIPS ∼66% +3%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H


74386 MIPS ∼64%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H


69637 MIPS ∼60% -6%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK


68520 MIPS ∼59% -8%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H


66768 MIPS ∼57% -10%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (11386 – 135927, n=227, final 2 years)





61467 MIPS ∼Fifty three% -17%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS


61292 MIPS ∼Fifty three% -18%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX


6880 MIPS ∼100% +24%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK


6186 MIPS ∼90% +11%

Moderate Intel Core i9-13900H
  (5570 – 6245, n=3)





6013 MIPS ∼87% +8%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H


5842 MIPS ∼85% +5%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS


5779 MIPS ∼84% +4%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H


5765 MIPS ∼84% +4%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (2685 – 7332, n=228, final 2 years)





5707 MIPS ∼83% +2%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H


5570 MIPS ∼81%

Geekbench 5.4 / Multi-Core
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX


20036 Functions ∼100% +forty five%

Moderate Intel Core i9-13900H
  (13796 – 15410, n=3)





14717 Functions ∼73% +7%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK


13865 Functions ∼69% +1%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H


13796 Functions ∼69%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H


13547 Functions ∼68% -2%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H


12125 Functions ∼61% -12%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (1946 – 21058, n=226, final 2 years)





10772 Functions ∼54% -22%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS


9836 Functions ∼49% -29%

Geekbench 5.4 / Single-Core
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX


2035 Functions ∼100% +18%

Moderate Intel Core i9-13900H
  (1718 – 2043, n=3)





1912 Functions ∼94% +11%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK


1870 Functions ∼92% +9%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H


1820 Functions ∼89% +6%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H


1788 Functions ∼88% +4%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H


1718 Functions ∼84%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (158 – 2139, n=226, final 2 years)





1635 Functions ∼80% -5%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS


1574 Functions ∼77% -8%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX


31 fps ∼100% +forty eight%

Moderate Intel Core i9-13900H
  (21 – 22.3, n=3)





21.7 fps ∼70% +3%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H


21 fps ∼68%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H


19.4 fps ∼63% -8%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H


19.2 fps ∼62% -9%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK


18.1 fps ∼58% -14%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS


17.5 fps ∼56% -17%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (3 – 34.8, n=231, final 2 years)





17 fps ∼55% -19%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS


59.1 s * ∼100% -2%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H


57.8 s * ∼98%

Moderate Intel Core i9-13900H
  (50.5 – 57.8, n=3)





Fifty three.3 s * ∼90% +8%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (32.8 – 332, n=228, final 2 years)





51.4 s * ∼87% +11%

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX


43.4 s * ∼73% +25%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H


39.8 s * ∼67% +31%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK


39 s * ∼66% +33%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H


38.2 s * ∼65% +34%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall imply
Moderate of class Gaming
  (0.3793 – 4.47, n=227, final 2 years)





0.518 sec * ∼100% -5%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS


0.5 sec * ∼97% -1%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H


0.4934 sec * ∼95%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H


0.4541 sec * ∼88% +8%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H


0.4474 sec * ∼86% +9%

Moderate Intel Core i9-13900H
  (0.412 – 0.4934, n=3)





0.4447 sec * ∼86% +10%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK


0.4155 sec * ∼80% +16%

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX


0.3955 sec * ∼76% +20%

* … smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2963 Functions

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

219 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

ninety nine.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

243 Functions

Aid

Performance Score
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU


98.2 pt ∼98%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU


73.6 pt ∼74%

Moderate Intel Core i9-13900H
 


73.2 pt ∼73%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S


64.9 pt ∼65%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H, RTX A3000 Notebook computer GPU


64.4 pt ∼64%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Notebook computer GPU


62.4 pt ∼62%

Moderate of class Gaming
 


59.2 pt ∼59%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Notebook computer GPU


50.8 pt ∼51%

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Imprint
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU


25949 KRay/s ∼100% +41%

Moderate Intel Core i9-13900H
  (18068 – 18961, n=3)





18471 KRay/s ∼71% 0%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU


18385 KRay/s ∼71%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S


16661 KRay/s ∼64% -9%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H, RTX A3000 Notebook computer GPU


14572 KRay/s ∼56% -21%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Notebook computer GPU


14490 KRay/s ∼56% -21%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (2585 – 52479, n=200, final 2 years)





13798 KRay/s ∼Fifty three% -25%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Notebook computer GPU


8265 KRay/s ∼32% -55%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU


129286 Functions ∼100% +42%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S


101275 Functions ∼78% +11%

Moderate Intel Core i9-13900H
  (90834 – 93802, n=3)





92076 Functions ∼71% +1%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU


90834 Functions ∼70%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Notebook computer GPU


75514 Functions ∼58% -17%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H, RTX A3000 Notebook computer GPU


73967 Functions ∼57% -19%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (12439 – 227882, n=200, final 2 years)





73417 Functions ∼57% -19%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Notebook computer GPU


38277 Functions ∼30% -58%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU


6338 MB/s ∼100% +51%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU


4187 MB/s ∼66%

Moderate Intel Core i9-13900H
  (4142 – 4207, n=3)





4179 MB/s ∼66% 0%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Notebook computer GPU


3663 MB/s ∼58% -13%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H, RTX A3000 Notebook computer GPU


3648 MB/s ∼58% -13%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S


3494 MB/s ∼55% -17%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (629 – 8525, n=200, final 2 years)





3458 MB/s ∼55% -17%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Notebook computer GPU


2931 MB/s ∼46% -30%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU


137876 Functions ∼100% +forty five%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Notebook computer GPU


110468 Functions ∼80% +16%

Moderate Intel Core i9-13900H
  (95175 – 120181, n=3)





110328 Functions ∼80% +16%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Notebook computer GPU


107042 Functions ∼78% +12%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S


104709 Functions ∼76% +10%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H, RTX A3000 Notebook computer GPU


101642 Functions ∼74% +7%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (15371 – 180473, n=200, final 2 years)





98190 Functions ∼71% +3%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU


95175 Functions ∼69%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU


16073 Functions ∼100% +Fifty three%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S


12691 Functions ∼seventy nine% +21%

Moderate Intel Core i9-13900H
  (10485 – 11631, n=3)





11090 Functions ∼69% +6%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (2137 – 29598, n=200, final 2 years)





10784 Functions ∼67% +3%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU


10485 Functions ∼65%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Notebook computer GPU


9717 Functions ∼60% -7%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Notebook computer GPU


9655 Functions ∼60% -8%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H, RTX A3000 Notebook computer GPU


9475 Functions ∼59% -10%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU


64736 Functions ∼100% +44%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S


55209 Functions ∼85% +23%

Moderate Intel Core i9-13900H
  (44967 – 46487, n=3)





45480 Functions ∼70% +1%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU


44967 Functions ∼69%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (7135 – 118401, n=200, final 2 years)





39575 Functions ∼61% -12%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Notebook computer GPU


36454 Functions ∼56% -19%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H, RTX A3000 Notebook computer GPU


35917 Functions ∼55% -20%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Notebook computer GPU


22873 Functions ∼35% -49%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU


149377 MB/s ∼100%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H, RTX A3000 Notebook computer GPU


132156 MB/s ∼88% -12%

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU


122159 MB/s ∼82% -18%

Moderate Intel Core i9-13900H
  (81622 – 149377, n=3)





105335 MB/s ∼71% -29%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (18146 – 236139, n=200, final 2 years)





101445 MB/s ∼68% -32%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Notebook computer GPU


91041 MB/s ∼61% -39%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Notebook computer GPU


71470 MB/s ∼forty eight% -52%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S


64725 MB/s ∼43% -57%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU


1829 MB/s ∼100% +Fifty three%

Moderate Intel Core i9-13900H
  (1192 – 1238, n=3)





1211 MB/s ∼66% +2%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU


1192 MB/s ∼65%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Notebook computer GPU


1037 MB/s ∼57% -13%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H, RTX A3000 Notebook computer GPU


1013 MB/s ∼55% -15%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Notebook computer GPU


988 MB/s ∼54% -17%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S


883 MB/s ∼forty eight% -26%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (150.9 – 2090, n=221, final 2 years)





869 MB/s ∼forty eight% -27%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Imprint
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU


14066 KRay/s ∼100% +43%

Moderate Intel Core i9-13900H
  (9803 – 10342, n=3)





10015 KRay/s ∼71% +2%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU


9803 KRay/s ∼70%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S


8923 KRay/s ∼63% -9%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Notebook computer GPU


8017 KRay/s ∼57% -18%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H, RTX A3000 Notebook computer GPU


7829 KRay/s ∼56% -20%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (1437 – 28105, n=200, final 2 years)





7498 KRay/s ∼Fifty three% -24%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Notebook computer GPU


4776 KRay/s ∼34% -51%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU


49634 MPixel/s ∼100% +11%

Moderate Intel Core i9-13900H
  (44611 – 51096, n=3)





48011 MPixel/s ∼97% +8%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Notebook computer GPU


46642 MPixel/s ∼94% +5%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU


44611 MPixel/s ∼90%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H, RTX A3000 Notebook computer GPU


42574 MPixel/s ∼86% -5%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Notebook computer GPU


38990 MPixel/s ∼seventy nine% -13%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (8341 – 51096, n=201, final 2 years)





29578 MPixel/s ∼60% -34%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S


27871 MPixel/s ∼56% -38%

In PCMark 10, our Aero exchanges blows with final year’s MSI CreatorPro Z16P. Sadly, the Aero has a frail productiveness ranking, however it does very effectively within the assorted sub-tests.

PCMark 10
PCMark 10
PCMark 10 / Rep
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10


8058 Functions ∼100%

Moderate Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU
 





8058 Functions ∼100% 0%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Notebook computer GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT


7816 Functions ∼97% -3%

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024


7609 Functions ∼94% -6%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
GeForce RTX 3060 Notebook computer GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR


7455 Functions ∼93% -7%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM


7332 Functions ∼91% -9%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (4477 – 9151, n=188, final 2 years)





7124 Functions ∼88% -12%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
RTX A3000 Notebook computer GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR


7086 Functions ∼88% -12%

PCMark 10 / Requirements
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024


11683 Functions ∼100% +3%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10


11332 Functions ∼97%

Moderate Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU
 





11332 Functions ∼97% 0%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
GeForce RTX 3060 Notebook computer GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR


11012 Functions ∼94% -3%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Notebook computer GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT


10945 Functions ∼94% -3%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM


10622 Functions ∼91% -6%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
RTX A3000 Notebook computer GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR


10583 Functions ∼91% -7%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (7334 – 12639, n=187, final 2 years)





10334 Functions ∼88% -9%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
GeForce RTX 3060 Notebook computer GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR


10076 Functions ∼100% +9%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Notebook computer GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT


10050 Functions ∼100% +9%

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024


9645 Functions ∼96% +4%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
RTX A3000 Notebook computer GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR


9351 Functions ∼93% +1%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM


9332 Functions ∼93% +1%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (6161 – 11833, n=187, final 2 years)





9308 Functions ∼92% +1%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10


9231 Functions ∼92%

Moderate Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU
 





9231 Functions ∼92% 0%

PCMark 10 / Digital Instruct material Creation
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10


13575 Functions ∼100%

Moderate Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU
 





13575 Functions ∼100% 0%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Notebook computer GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT


11777 Functions ∼87% -13%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM


10790 Functions ∼seventy nine% -21%

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024


10611 Functions ∼78% -22%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (5288 – 16424, n=187, final 2 years)





10243 Functions ∼75% -25%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
GeForce RTX 3060 Notebook computer GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR


10132 Functions ∼75% -25%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
RTX A3000 Notebook computer GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR


9757 Functions ∼72% -28%

CrossMark / Overall
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024


2127 Functions ∼100% +13%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Notebook computer GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT


2113 Functions ∼ninety nine% +12%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
RTX A3000 Notebook computer GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR


1932 Functions ∼91% +3%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10


1882 Functions ∼88%

Moderate Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU
 





1882 Functions ∼88% 0%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (974 – 2195, n=92, final 2 years)





1818 Functions ∼85% -3%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
GeForce RTX 3060 Notebook computer GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR


1789 Functions ∼84% -5%

CrossMark / Productivity
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Notebook computer GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT


2031 Functions ∼100% +14%

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024


1969 Functions ∼97% +11%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
RTX A3000 Notebook computer GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR


1823 Functions ∼90% +2%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10


1781 Functions ∼88%

Moderate Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU
 





1781 Functions ∼88% 0%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (907 – 2062, n=92, final 2 years)





1746 Functions ∼86% -2%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
GeForce RTX 3060 Notebook computer GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR


1677 Functions ∼83% -6%

CrossMark / Creativity
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024


2390 Functions ∼100% +21%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Notebook computer GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT


2161 Functions ∼90% +9%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
RTX A3000 Notebook computer GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR


2071 Functions ∼87% +5%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
GeForce RTX 3060 Notebook computer GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR


2032 Functions ∼85% +3%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10


1978 Functions ∼83%

Moderate Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU
 





1978 Functions ∼83% 0%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (1027 – 2514, n=92, final 2 years)





1949 Functions ∼82% -1%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Notebook computer GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT


2228 Functions ∼100% +16%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10


1915 Functions ∼86%

Moderate Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU
 





1915 Functions ∼86% 0%

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024


1891 Functions ∼85% -1%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
RTX A3000 Notebook computer GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR


1865 Functions ∼84% -3%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (1029 – 2230, n=92, final 2 years)





1683 Functions ∼76% -12%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
GeForce RTX 3060 Notebook computer GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR


1486 Functions ∼67% -22%

PCMark 10 Rep 8058 factors

Aid

AIDA64 / Reminiscence Reproduction
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Notebook computer GPU


71596 MB/s ∼100% +8%

Moderate Intel Core i9-13900H
  (66344 – 74650, n=3)





70489 MB/s ∼98% +6%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU


66344 MB/s ∼93%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H, RTX A3000 Notebook computer GPU


62711 MB/s ∼88% -5%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Notebook computer GPU


62419 MB/s ∼87% -6%

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Notebook computer GPU


53391 MB/s ∼75% -20%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (18074 – 78835, n=200, final 2 years)





50239 MB/s ∼70% -24%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S


48549 MB/s ∼68% -27%

AIDA64 / Reminiscence Study
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Notebook computer GPU


72739 MB/s ∼100% +7%

Moderate Intel Core i9-13900H
  (68252 – 75425, n=3)





71343 MB/s ∼98% +5%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU


68252 MB/s ∼94%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Notebook computer GPU


65835 MB/s ∼91% -4%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H, RTX A3000 Notebook computer GPU


65648 MB/s ∼90% -4%

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Notebook computer GPU


61613 MB/s ∼85% -10%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (20318 – 86294, n=200, final 2 years)





53835 MB/s ∼74% -21%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S


50338 MB/s ∼69% -26%

AIDA64 / Reminiscence Write
Moderate Intel Core i9-13900H
  (68170 – 74646, n=3)





71274 MB/s ∼100% +5%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU


68170 MB/s ∼96%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H, RTX A3000 Notebook computer GPU


65459 MB/s ∼92% -4%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Notebook computer GPU


62746 MB/s ∼88% -8%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Notebook computer GPU


61981 MB/s ∼87% -9%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S


55012 MB/s ∼77% -19%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (15975 – 80441, n=200, final 2 years)





51297 MB/s ∼72% -25%

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Notebook computer GPU


50700 MB/s ∼71% -26%

AIDA64 / Reminiscence Latency
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Notebook computer GPU


107.9 ns * ∼100% -14%

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Notebook computer GPU


101.7 ns * ∼94% -8%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H, RTX A3000 Notebook computer GPU


95.2 ns * ∼88% -1%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU


94.4 ns * ∼87%

Moderate Intel Core i9-13900H
  (88 – ninety nine.4, n=3)





93.9 ns * ∼87% +1%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Notebook computer GPU


89.7 ns * ∼83% +5%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S


84.6 ns * ∼78% +10%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (76.2 – 135.3, n=221, final 2 years)





69.2 ns * ∼64% +27%

* … smaller is better

Quickly after beginning LatencyMon, the machine detects doubtlessly the predominant DPC latencies. These amplify extra when launching the browser and opening multiple tabs. Our 4K/60 fps YouTube video, on the assorted hand, is rendered with out problems and with out skipped frames.

The Razer Blade 18 has even worse latency values than our Aero.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon – interrupt to direction of latency (max), Net, Youtube, Prime95
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024


1169.3 μs * ∼100% -11%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10


1053.8 μs * ∼90%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Notebook computer GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT


623 μs * ∼Fifty three% +41%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
RTX A3000 Notebook computer GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR


512.3 μs * ∼44% +51%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
GeForce RTX 3060 Notebook computer GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR


424.1 μs * ∼36% +60%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM


237.9 μs * ∼20% +77%

* … smaller is better

The SSD
The SSD

The manufacturer uses a extremely rapidly PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD from its occupy firm. It’s at display ranked 2d in our excellent checklist.

The model here doesn’t relatively attain its excellent performance, significantly for the explanation that Phison memory within the predecessor (injurious 1) is a tad sooner.

No lower than performance is relatively constant, and it is upright that a cooling pad is linked to the atrocious plate.

CDM 5/6 Study Seq Q32T1:
7051 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
4407 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Study 4K Q32T1:
827 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
757 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Study 4K:
73.2 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
213 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8:
724 MB/s

CDM 6 Study 4K Q8T8:
1626 MB/s

Pressure Performance Score – Percent
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT


93.5 pt ∼94%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST -8!
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR


87.2 pt ∼87%

Moderate Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
 


84.5 pt ∼85%

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024


80 pt ∼80%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10


73.8 pt ∼74%

Moderate of class Gaming
 


63.3 pt ∼63%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR


63.1 pt ∼63%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM


54.9 pt ∼55%

DiskSpd
seq read
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024




3889 (3873.65min – 3888.73max) MB/s ∼100% +54%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT





3819 (3405.77min – 3819.33max) MB/s ∼98% +52%

Moderate Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (2519 – 4117, n=5)





3448 MB/s ∼89% +37%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (834 – 5676, n=186, final 2 years)





3070 MB/s ∼seventy nine% +22%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10


2519 MB/s ∼65%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM





2460 (2456.1min – 2460.17max) MB/s ∼63% -2%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR





1761 (1552.52min – 1761.4max) MB/s ∼forty five% -30%

seq write
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT


4457 MB/s ∼100% +35%

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024





3798 (3750.39min – 3798.15max) MB/s ∼85% +15%

Moderate Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (2200 – 4236, n=5)





3340 MB/s ∼75% +1%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR




3297 (3192.19min – 3296.93max) MB/s ∼74% 0%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10




3291 (3216.4min – 3290.77max) MB/s ∼74%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (399 – 7889, n=185, final 2 years)





3265 MB/s ∼73% -1%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM





2991 (2932.66min – 2991.forty eightmax) MB/s ∼67% -9%

seq q8 t1 read
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT




7028 (6634.28min – 7027.76max) MB/s ∼100% +1%

Moderate Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (6921 – 7034, n=5)





6988 MB/s ∼ninety nine% +1%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10




6935 (5510.15min – 6934.86max) MB/s ∼ninety nine%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR





6911 (1344.52min – 6911.16max) MB/s ∼98% 0%

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024




6810 (6260.27min – 6809.87max) MB/s ∼97% -2%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (1620 – 13195, n=186, final 2 years)





5317 MB/s ∼76% -23%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM





4633 (4029.05min – 4633.forty fivemax) MB/s ∼66% -33%

seq q8 t1 write
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR




5171 (5109.92min – 5170.88max) MB/s ∼100% +5%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT





5004 (4980.32min – 5004.43max) MB/s ∼97% +2%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10




4926 (4833.5min – 4926max) MB/s ∼95%

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024





4426 (4263.58min – 4426.04max) MB/s ∼86% -10%

Moderate Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (3611 – 4926, n=5)





4285 MB/s ∼83% -13%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (86.2 – 10261, n=186, final 2 years)





4002 MB/s ∼77% -19%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM





3415 (3353.98min – 3415.42max) MB/s ∼66% -31%

4k q1 t1 read
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT


88.7 MB/s ∼100% +33%

Moderate Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (66.9 – 88.8, n=5)





77.4 MB/s ∼87% +16%

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024





74.5 (73.46min – 74.52max) MB/s ∼84% +11%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR




73.5 (72.63min – 73.49max) MB/s ∼83% +10%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10




66.9 (50.9min – 66.86max) MB/s ∼75%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (23.3 – 97.4, n=186, final 2 years)





64.6 MB/s ∼73% -3%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM




35.5 (35.31min – 35.47max) MB/s ∼40% -47%

4k q1 t1 write
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT





373 (371.9min – 373.21max) MB/s ∼100% +19%

Moderate Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (313 – 391, n=5)





342 MB/s ∼92% +9%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10





313 (306.34min – 313.21max) MB/s ∼84%

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024




280 (267.82min – 279.seventy ninemax) MB/s ∼75% -11%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (66.6 – 421, n=185, final 2 years)





201 MB/s ∼54% -36%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM




181.3 (175.93min – 181.25max) MB/s ∼49% -42%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR




144 (137.81min – 144max) MB/s ∼39% -54%

4k q32 t16 read
Moderate Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (3523 – 3582, n=5)





3557 MB/s ∼100% +1%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT





3555 (3552.55min – 3555.1max) MB/s ∼100% +1%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10




3523 (3416.03min – 3522.69max) MB/s ∼ninety nine%

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024





3203 (3180.36min – 3203.41max) MB/s ∼90% -9%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (310 – 5829, n=185, final 2 years)





2293 MB/s ∼64% -35%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM




2025 (1213.07min – 2024.78max) MB/s ∼57% -43%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR





803 (763.32min – 803.25max) MB/s ∼23% -77%

4k q32 t16 write
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT





3612 (3585.78min – 3612.01max) MB/s ∼100% 0%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10





3597 (3488.54min – 3597.4max) MB/s ∼100%

Moderate Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (3570 – 3604, n=5)





3589 MB/s ∼ninety nine% 0%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM




2291 (2256.15min – 2290.93max) MB/s ∼63% -36%

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024




2209 (1041.25min – 2208.74max) MB/s ∼61% -39%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (288 – 4383, n=185, final 2 years)





2019 MB/s ∼56% -44%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR




456 (436.66min – 455.51max) MB/s ∼13% -87%

AS SSD
Rep Total
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT


9380 Functions ∼100% +66%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR


8992 Functions ∼96% +60%

Moderate Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (5636 – 9279, n=5)





8422 Functions ∼90% +49%

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024


7745 Functions ∼83% +37%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (910 – 10330, n=173, final 2 years)





6206 Functions ∼66% +10%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM


5903 Functions ∼63% +5%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10


5636 Functions ∼60%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR


5598 Functions ∼60% -1%

Rep Study
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT


3634 Functions ∼100% +101%

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024


3490 Functions ∼96% +93%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR


3378 Functions ∼93% +87%

Moderate Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (1805 – 3629, n=5)





3205 Functions ∼88% +78%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM


2348 Functions ∼65% +30%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (389 – 3629, n=173, final 2 years)





2323 Functions ∼64% +29%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10


1805 Functions ∼50%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR


1474 Functions ∼41% -18%

Rep Write
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT


3991 Functions ∼100% +33%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR


3941 Functions ∼ninety nine% +31%

Moderate Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (3012 – 3996, n=5)





3664 Functions ∼92% +22%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR


3464 Functions ∼87% +15%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10


3012 Functions ∼75%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (338 – 5157, n=173, final 2 years)





2736 Functions ∼69% -9%

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024


2566 Functions ∼64% -15%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM


2404 Functions ∼60% -20%

Seq Study
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024


5770.seventy nine MB/s ∼100% +26%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT


5588 MB/s ∼97% +22%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR


5251.18 MB/s ∼91% +15%

Moderate Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (4541 – 5715, n=5)





5092 MB/s ∼88% +11%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR


5033 MB/s ∼87% +10%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10


4582 MB/s ∼seventy nine%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (925 – 9971, n=173, final 2 years)





4201 MB/s ∼73% -8%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM


3976.Fifty three MB/s ∼69% -13%

Seq Write
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024


3951.34 MB/s ∼100% +71%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR


3879 MB/s ∼98% +68%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT


3267 MB/s ∼83% +41%

Moderate Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (2310 – 3806, n=5)





3161 MB/s ∼80% +37%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (308 – 8590, n=173, final 2 years)





3057 MB/s ∼77% +32%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM


3020.8 MB/s ∼76% +31%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR


2957.08 MB/s ∼75% +28%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10


2310 MB/s ∼58%

4K Study
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT


109.4 MB/s ∼100% +78%

Moderate Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (61.3 – 108, n=5)





94 MB/s ∼86% +Fifty three%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR


84 MB/s ∼77% +37%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR


76.65 MB/s ∼70% +25%

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024


69.72 MB/s ∼64% +14%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (20 – 108, n=173, final 2 years)





62.5 MB/s ∼57% +2%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10


61.3 MB/s ∼56%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM


49.25 MB/s ∼forty five% -20%

4K Write
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT


321.6 MB/s ∼100% +12%

Moderate Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (256 – 325, n=5)





293 MB/s ∼91% +2%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10


288 MB/s ∼90%

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024


241.69 MB/s ∼75% -16%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR


217.2 MB/s ∼68% -25%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR


199.Fifty three MB/s ∼62% -31%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (18 – 364, n=173, final 2 years)





180.7 MB/s ∼56% -37%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM


152.75 MB/s ∼47% -47%

4K-64 Study
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT


2966 MB/s ∼100% +131%

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024


2843.31 MB/s ∼96% +121%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR


2790.34 MB/s ∼94% +117%

Moderate Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (1285 – 2963, n=5)





2602 MB/s ∼88% +102%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM


1901.41 MB/s ∼64% +forty eight%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (216 – 2963, n=173, final 2 years)





1841 MB/s ∼62% +43%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10


1285 MB/s ∼43%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR


871.83 MB/s ∼29% -32%

4K-64 Write
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT


3342 MB/s ∼100% +34%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR


3336.29 MB/s ∼100% +34%

Moderate Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (2493 – 3371, n=5)





3054 MB/s ∼91% +23%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR


2968.9 MB/s ∼89% +19%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10


2493 MB/s ∼75%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (243 – 4381, n=173, final 2 years)





2261 MB/s ∼68% -9%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM


1949.13 MB/s ∼58% -22%

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024


1929.02 MB/s ∼58% -23%

Get entry to Time Study
Moderate Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (0.041 – 0.094, n=5)





0.0648 ms * ∼100% -58%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (0.022 – 0.23, n=168, final 2 years)





0.05675 ms * ∼88% -38%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT


0.056 ms * ∼86% -37%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM


0.05 ms * ∼77% -22%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10


0.041 ms * ∼63%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR


0.039 ms * ∼60% +5%

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024


0.026 ms * ∼40% +37%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR


0.022 ms * ∼34% +46%

Get entry to Time Write
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM


0.105 ms * ∼100% -708%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (0.012 – 0.425, n=173, final 2 years)





0.05704 ms * ∼54% -339%

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024


0.056 ms * ∼Fifty three% -331%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR


0.02 ms * ∼19% -54%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR


0.019 ms * ∼18% -46%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10


0.013 ms * ∼12%

Moderate Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (0.012 – 0.014, n=5)





0.013 ms * ∼12% -0%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT


0.012 ms * ∼11% +8%

* … smaller is better

035070010501400175021002450280031503500385042004550490052505600595063006650Tooltip

In phrases of the GPU, you glean gotten the preference between the RTX 4060 and RTX 4070; the more highly effective variant is installed in our take a look at unit. In the thin Aero, it customarily consumes around 105 W. Possibly the most is 115 plus 25 W Dynamic Boost, however our colleague Andreas lately identified in his review of the card that no longer ceaselessly any performance will enhance happen above 100 W for the RTX 4070.

In the artificial 3DMarks, the card is on the expected stage, even though we accomplish no longer glean too many different measurements in our database. Finally, it is every so recurrently ahead of competing gadgets with an RTX 3080 Ti, whereas the predecessor with its RTX 3080 Ti is also overwhelmed by nearly 20 p.c, the CreatorPro by 30 p.c. Even the Blade 18 with the identical GPU and nominally sooner CPU is form of of within the assist of. The Alienware x15 R2 with its RTX 3080 Ti, on the assorted hand, is form of of ahead.

Change 3D performance is misplaced in Battery Mode, with the ranking in Fire Strike dropping by nearly 70 p.c!

3DMark Performance Score – Percent
Moderate NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU
 


ninety nine.1 pt ∼ninety nine%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H


98.8 pt ∼ninety nine%

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX


96.9 pt ∼97%

Moderate of class Gaming
 


85.3 pt ∼85%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS


81.4 pt ∼81%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Notebook computer GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK


80.9 pt ∼81%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Notebook computer GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H


65.7 pt ∼66%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Notebook computer GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H


63.5 pt ∼64%

3DMark 11 – 1280×720 Performance GPU
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H


41480 Functions ∼100%

Moderate NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU
  (39104 – 41480, n=5)





40351 Functions ∼97% -3%

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX


39733 Functions ∼96% -4%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (1029 – 71432, n=222, final 2 years)





34398 Functions ∼83% -17%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS


33988 Functions ∼82% -18%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Notebook computer GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK


33249 Functions ∼80% -20%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Notebook computer GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H


27419 Functions ∼66% -34%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Notebook computer GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H


25990 Functions ∼63% -37%

3DMark
1920×1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Moderate NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU
  (28374 – 31054, n=5)





29530 Functions ∼100% +2%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H


28885 Functions ∼98%

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX


28743 Functions ∼97% 0%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (781 – 49247, n=234, final 2 years)





25966 Functions ∼88% -10%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS


25514 Functions ∼86% -12%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Notebook computer GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK


24580 Functions ∼83% -15%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Notebook computer GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H


19710 Functions ∼67% -32%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Notebook computer GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H


19496 Functions ∼66% -33%

2560×1440 Time Ogle Graphics
Moderate NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU
  (11683 – 12529, n=5)





11976 Functions ∼100% +2%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H


11798 Functions ∼ninety nine%

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX


11683 Functions ∼98% -1%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (224 – 22479, n=235, final 2 years)





10184 Functions ∼85% -14%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Notebook computer GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK


9488 Functions ∼seventy nine% -20%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS


9080 Functions ∼76% -23%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Notebook computer GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H


7771 Functions ∼65% -34%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Notebook computer GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H


7320 Functions ∼61% -38%

3DMark 11 Performance 33703 factors
3DMark Cloud Gate Fashioned Rep 55475 factors
3DMark Fire Strike Rep 25526 factors
3DMark Fire Strike Low Rep 13175 factors
3DMark Time Ogle Rep 12029 factors

Aid

Blender
v3.3 College room HIP/AMD
Moderate of class Gaming
  (51 – 668, n=10, final 2 years)





266 Seconds * ∼100%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS


74 Seconds * ∼28%

v3.3 College room OPTIX/RTX
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Notebook computer GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H


37 Seconds * ∼100% -76%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Notebook computer GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H


34 Seconds * ∼92% -62%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (9 – 142, n=65, final 2 years)





25.7 Seconds * ∼69% -22%

Moderate NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU
  (20 – 24, n=5)





21.2 Seconds * ∼57% -1%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H


21 Seconds * ∼57%

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX


20 Seconds * ∼54% +5%

v3.3 College room CUDA
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Notebook computer GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H


62 Seconds * ∼100% -82%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Notebook computer GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H


60 Seconds * ∼97% -76%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (17 – 168, n=67, final 2 years)





43.6 Seconds * ∼70% -28%

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX


36 Seconds * ∼58% -6%

Moderate NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU
  (34 – 37, n=5)





35.1 Seconds * ∼57% -3%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H


34 Seconds * ∼55%

v3.3 College room CPU
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS


376 Seconds * ∼100% -24%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Notebook computer GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H


339 Seconds * ∼90% -12%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (147 – 698, n=77, final 2 years)





329 Seconds * ∼88% -8%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Notebook computer GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H


315 Seconds * ∼84% -4%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H


304 Seconds * ∼81%

Moderate NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU
  (158 – 304, n=5)





226 Seconds * ∼60% +26%

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX


196 Seconds * ∼52% +36%

* … smaller is better

In gaming, the Aero 16 is upright overtaken by the Blade 18 general, and most effective attributable to the frail ends in DOTA 2 Reborn and X-Plane 11.11. The Aero even has the brink in GPU-heavy games. That is interesting for the explanation that RTX 4070 is allowed 140 W within the Blade, however most effective 105 W within the Aero, which confirms that it makes itsy-bitsy sense to bustle the card above 100 W for the time being.

Overall, it would handle all games as much as 2K and each so recurrently even above, even though the card every so recurrently runs out of steam in very stressful games at 4K.

Ray tracing performance, on the assorted hand, is terribly upright. In Cyberpunkt, it most effective drops from around 85 to 65 fps with activated ray tracing at 1080p.

Performance Score – Percent
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU


ninety nine.3 pt ∼ninety nine%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU


93.8 pt ∼94%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Notebook computer GPU


80.9 pt ∼81%

Moderate of class Gaming
 


77.4 pt ∼77%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Notebook computer GPU


70.5 pt ∼71%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S


65.8 pt ∼66%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Notebook computer GPU


64.8 pt ∼65%

The Witcher 3 – 1920×1080 Extremely Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU




116 (forty eight.5P0.1, 82.5P1) fps ∼100%

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU




113.9 (110min) fps ∼98% -2%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (8.61 – 216, n=225, final 2 years)





97.5 fps ∼84% -16%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Notebook computer GPU




92.2 (19.1min, forty five.8P0.1, 67.7P1) fps ∼seventy nine% -21%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S




91 (77min) fps ∼78% -22%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Notebook computer GPU


70 fps ∼60% -40%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Notebook computer GPU




59.6 (54min, 56P1) fps ∼51% -49%

GTA V – 1920×1080 Top Settings doable AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU




123.2 (3.96min, 76.9P1) fps ∼100%

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU




121.4 (3.6min, 76.9P1) fps ∼ninety nine% -1%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Notebook computer GPU




113 (20.6min, 76.9P1) fps ∼92% -8%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Notebook computer GPU




97.6 (9.44min, 66.7P1) fps ∼seventy nine% -21%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (4.18 – 151.6, n=225, final 2 years)





96.6 fps ∼78% -22%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Notebook computer GPU




95.3 (6.43min, 66.7P1) fps ∼77% -23%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S




85.5 (3.46min, 62.5P1) fps ∼69% -31%

Closing Sage XV Benchmark – 1920×1080 High Quality
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU


116.2 fps ∼100%

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU


115.2 fps ∼ninety nine% -1%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (9.13 – 194.9, n=225, final 2 years)





95.6 fps ∼82% -18%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Notebook computer GPU


85.8 fps ∼74% -26%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Notebook computer GPU


83.8 fps ∼72% -28%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S


78.2 fps ∼67% -33%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Notebook computer GPU


64.3 fps ∼55% -forty five%

Habitual Brigade – 1920×1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU




208 (39.5min, 154.8P1) fps ∼100% +2%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU




204 (39min, 153.9P1) fps ∼98%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (10.9 – 421, n=227, final 2 years)





173.1 fps ∼83% -15%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S




162.7 (111.4min, 120.7P1) fps ∼78% -20%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Notebook computer GPU




151 (35.4min, 116P1) fps ∼73% -26%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Notebook computer GPU




139.1 (28min, 105.6P1) fps ∼67% -32%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Notebook computer GPU


108 fps ∼52% -47%

Dota 2 Reborn – 1920×1080 ultra (3/3) excellent attempting
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU




178.6 (153.9min) fps ∼100% +24%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Notebook computer GPU




160 (139.4min) fps ∼90% +11%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Notebook computer GPU




147.1 (127.8min) fps ∼82% +2%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU




144.5 (123.6min) fps ∼81%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Notebook computer GPU




135.1 (120.3min) fps ∼76% -7%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (22 – 194.7, n=245, final 2 years)





129.3 fps ∼72% -11%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S




110 (85.8min) fps ∼62% -24%

X-Plane 11.11 – 1920×1080 high (fps_test=3)
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU


137.9 fps ∼100% +20%

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Notebook computer GPU


115.3 fps ∼84%

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Notebook computer GPU


108 fps ∼78% -6%

MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Notebook computer GPU


97.5 fps ∼71% -15%

Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Notebook computer GPU


94.7 fps ∼69% -18%

Moderate of class Gaming
  (12.4 – 146.4, n=249, final 2 years)





88.6 fps ∼64% -23%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S


55 fps ∼40% -52%

The Aero 16 does no longer provide Evolved Optimus, and the identical applies to Nvidia’s Remark Mode. On the other hand, a MUX switch is on hand so as that you doubtlessly can additionally manually switch between iGPU and dGPU.

In gaming mode, the frame rate in Witcher 3 is extraordinarily constant for over an hour and is above that of a Razer Blade 18

The GPU’s vitality consumption is nearly constant at around 105 W, meaning that every and each the core clock (2,350 MHz) and memory clock (2,000 MHz) are also very constant. The cardboard heats as much as about 80 °C.